For importers,Entrepot Tradein the short term, it may bring some additional logistics complexity and costs. However, in the long run, as it can effectively avoid anti - dumping duties, the overall import costs will be significantly reduced, which will have a positive impact on the business efficiency of the enterprise.

Direct - shipping method:Cost = Direct - shipping fee + Normal tariff + Anti - dumping dutyMaritime TransportationTransshipment method:

Cost = First - leg ocean freight + Transshipment container - changing and supporting document fee + Second - leg ocean freight + Normal tariffAs can be seen from the above, although transshipment adds transshipment links in the logistics process, increasing the ocean freight, transshipment costs, and document - supporting costs compared with the direct - shipping method, the high - value anti - dumping duties that can be avoided often lead to a decrease in the overall cost, thus achieving an improvement in economic efficiency.

Case illustration:

When the EU imposes high anti - dumping duties on energy - saving lamps imported from China, an effective strategy is to use transshipment to avoid them. Specifically, in addition to the normal 8% tariff on energy - saving lamps imported from China, the EU also requires the payment of a 66% anti - dumping duty. This undoubtedly greatly increases the import costs for importers. However, if the transshipment strategy is adopted, with transshipment through a third country, the situation will change.As shown in the figure, in the transshipment method, the entire ocean shipping consists of two legs of ocean shipping, the first - leg and the second - leg, and there is also a container - changing operation at the transshipment port. While changing the container at the transshipment port, supporting documents from the third country and a full set of relevant export documents are provided. The Shipper of the second - leg bill of lading is changed to the applicant of the third - country CO, and the port of departure of the second - leg bill of lading is the port of the transshipment country, so as to avoid the anti - dumping duty on Chinese products.

Take the transshipment of energy - saving lamps as an example: A 20 - foot container of energy - saving lamps is worth $40,000. If imported in the normal way, in addition to the normal tariff, an additional $26,400 of anti - dumping duty needs to be paid. However, if the transshipment method is adopted, even if all transshipment costs and direct - shipping ocean freight need to be paid, the increased cost is less than $4,000, that is, the additional cost can be controlled to less than 10% of the value of the goods; if a 40 - foot container is used for shipping, the additional transshipment cost can be reduced to less than 5% of the value of the goods.It is recommended to verify through the following methods:This case clearly shows that in the face of high anti - dumping duties, using the transshipment strategy can effectively reduce the costs of importers, thus ensuring the competitiveness of goods.

However, it should be noted that the legality of transshipment may be questioned in some countries and regions and may trigger anti - dumping investigations. Therefore, during the implementation of transshipment, enterprises must understand and comply with the trade regulations of relevant countries and regions to avoid legal disputes caused by violations.

In addition, the specific implementation of transshipment also requires detailed analysis and planning according to products, destinations, and relevant tax policies. This process may require professional logistics, trade, and legal knowledge. Therefore, if lacking relevant experience and professional knowledge, enterprises may need to seek professional consulting services.

Detailed Explanation of the Establishment and Application Process of Export Supervision Warehouses

Revealing the Profit Margin of Foreign Trade: How Different Industries Reasonably Obtain High Profits?